Rick Berman Attacks the Humane Society
Front group man extraordinaire Rick Berman and his attack group, the Center for Consumer Freedom (CCF), have launched a new Web site, HumaneWatch.org, to harass the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS), the country's largest animal welfare organization. In pursuing its mission of stopping animal cruelty, HSUS has apparently run afoul of some large, wealthy business interests, and now it is getting some major pushback.
The Humane Society works to stop egregious, ongoing animal abuse, particularly in money-making enterprises like puppy mills, factory farming, dogfighting, cockfighting, and unsporting hunting practices like "canned hunts," where hunters pay to shoot at captive, domestically-raised, exotic animals. While this is a laudable goal, it pits HSUS against a significant number of wealthy, powerful businesses that engage in animal cruelty practices, like meat and egg producers, factory farmers, canned hunting businesses, contract research labs that do animal testing for big corporations and pharmaceutical companies that exploit animals to manufacture drugs like Premarin, which is used to treat the symptoms of menopause. Premarin is made from pregnant mares' urine and is marketed by Wyeth Pharmacueticals, one of the world's largest drug companies.
People Love Animals
HumaneWatch.org may have a hard time trying to build public animosity towards the Humane Society, since most of civil society cannot countenance the extreme cruelty against animals that occurs in these facilities. (There are now a number of videos showing such treatment posted at SourceWatch.org). At present, Berman's site, HumaneWatch.org, is trying to generate outrage against HSUS by ridiculing the group's recent activities, like raising funds for animal relief in Haiti and marketing its own brand of cruelty-free, all-natural dry dog food that does not support the factory farming industry. HumaneWatch is also trying to hurt and embarrass businesses that donate to HSUS, like the Yellow Tail Wine company, which recently donated $100,000 to HSUS's Animal Rescue Team. To target Yellow Tail, HumaneWatch.org posted a video of a cowboy standing in a manure-filled pen surrounded by cows, and pouring a bottle of Yellow Tail wine on the ground, while explaining that he is doing it to retaliate against the company for supporting the Humane Society. The video makes you want to donate to HSUS and go out and buy Yellow Tail wine to thank them for caring about animals.
Berman's Guy Behind HumaneWatch.org: David Martosko
HumaneWatch.org is essentially a one-man blog written by David Martosko, a spokesman for Berman and CCF. Martosko is best known for parroting Berman's industry-paid positions that mercury levels in edible fish pose no harm to children, and drunk driving is no longer much of a problem. Martosko served as CCF's Director of Research in 2006. His qualifications? He was a music major in college and an AM radio talk show producer after that. CCF is an industry-funded organization that Berman set up back in 1995 as a front group for tobacco, alcohol and restaurant industry interests, and it is now famous for running smear campaigns that it dresses up to look like public interest campaigns.
Who is Funding HumaneWatch.org?
Berman typically sets up his front groups as 501(c)4 organizations and then carries out his attacks through these groups to avoid disclosing his donors, so we have no way of knowing which industries or companies are funding Berman's attack on the Humane Society. We can probably get a good idea, though. Just determine which businesses profit most from animal cruelty, and you'll likely find the funders among them.
One thing we can be certain about: the Humane Society must be doing a decent job of lobbying on behalf of animal welfare, or it wouldn't have found itself in Berman's crosshairs.





Comments
Nice Article
Don't let the (ridiculous) turkeys get you down. They were so obviously sent here to comment by the org that you're outing. Keep fighting the good fight for helpless animals!
Rational Animal Humanitarian
I'm a carnivore and I wear leather. I own a horse that I purchased. It's a choice. I've also been a very active animal rescue volunteer for over 30 years. I can vouch that dog and cat rescue are much easier than horse rescue. My housepets have always been rescues (my dogs had been puppymill adult breeding stock). I've lived all over the globe and have personally witnessed both humane and inhumane animal treatment. I'm over-qualified by far too many professional certificates and university degrees. These are my sole credentials for my opinion basis.
Humanitarian efforts towards living creatures is as much a polarizing topic as religion or politics or child-rearing. But what we are facing, per Anne's blog here, is commentary on spin-doctoring. CCF has been a spin-doctor tank all its existence, no matter who the target for their attacks. That's their bread and butter. They make great money irking people on behalf of the CCF contributors -- who much prefer staying anonymous.
The US Postal Service is issuing stamps as of the end of April to raise awareness of the millions of pets in shelters. CCF is behind an email campaign sent to all volunteer animal rescue groups to counter this effort. Here's the body of that email:
<
A new stamp is coming out the end of April called "Animal Rescue: Adopt A Shelter Pet Stamp" featuring shelter dogs and cats. The purpose of the stamp is to raise awareness to the millions of dogs and cats in shelters across the U.S. To launch the stamp Ellen DeGeneres is giving one million meals to shelters when people buy the stamps. The cost is the same as a regular stamp - 44 cents.
Money from these stamps is going to HSUS. Ellen has not been shy about her support of HSUS. Money given there will not go to animals in shelters. HSUS's 2008 tax returns revealed that less than 1/2 of 1 percent of their budget funds a
traditional (dog/cat) shelter. Money given to HSUS goes instead toward lobbying, anti-animal ownership legislation and attorneys.
Please DO NOT BUY these stamps and advise your friends to do the same. The agenda of the HSUS is ANTI-ANIMAL OWNERSHIP!!! >>
First, test the assumption made here. A celebrity is sending one million meals of food to shelters (she co-owns a pet food company) to launch these stamps. What's the problem with that? It's her money; she can do whatever she wants with it.
That same celebrity endorses the non-profit HSUS. She can do that too. It's her choice.
"Money given there will not go to animals in shelters" Now there's a real logical gap here. The celebrity is giving meals( pet food) to animal shelters. So, I ask, WHAT MONEY? The donation is in the form of pet food.
Neither the celebrity nor HSUS are garnering any cash from the USPS issued stamps.
Ah, yes, spin-doctoring...it's actually an example of required discretionary reading and hearing skills, isn't it? It's word play for the penultimate goal of getting an emotional reaction to trigger behaviors. Suddenly, donated pet food is magically being transmuted to monetary funds going to HSUS. Did you notice that transition? It's like one of those visual perception puzzles. What did you REALLY see and comprehend?
But after broadcasting this CCF originated email, the small (a couple hundred members) rescue group to which I belong had our group website deluged with responses from members pledging not to buy the stamps. However, we actually have some members who have a strong nose for propaganda. One such posted:
<
Here's a link to the USPS and you can see all the sponsors, none of whom get any money from the sale of the stamps. This goes back several years when the HSUS bought rights to post their advertising on stamps from a company who works with the Post Office. I don't know all the details of how it worked, but this particular campaign will not put any money into the HSUS's pockets.
http://stampstotherescue.com/ thecampaign. asp>>
Ah, the joys of critical reading skills and the ever-questioning mind.
I don't like the HSUS
I am not a fan of HSUS nor will I ever be. I feel that they are lobbyists and they deceive individuals on their website regarding donations. They make people think that they are having a direct impact on helping animals, when in fact it's paying for lobbying against any extreme measure they deem fit. It's just wrong.
I tell everyone I know that if you want to make an impact and help out locally, where you live. Donate directly to that shelter. I live in Indiana and we have Humane Societies in just about every county. But I think it's a "mindset" that people believe the HSUS is like a Corporate office for the Humane Societies in our communities and it's NOT. So again, if you worked hard for your money and want to donate it so that the animals actually benefit, take it directly to the shelter or organization you want it to go to. We work too hard to have our money not go to the animals.
So now the problem is that
So now the problem is that HSUS IS NOT part of the local shelter system?
Since you are obviously not a member, why are you complaining about being "deceived". You sound like you've been reading to many CCF sites or maybe that idiotic "AR-HR" (Animal Rights or Human Responsibility) site. Probably more appropriately called "Animal Rights or Corporate Profits". The actually have an ad campaign about HSUS "deception", even though it is obviously run by a disgruntled dog breeder going by the name of "Erica Saunders". He or she does nothing but complain about HSUS puppy mill raids and other animal abuse exposures. The breeders and animal profiteers have all got their fangs out because somebody is threatening their cash cow and they may actually have to get a job!
Well, good for HSUS!
To be honest, a lot of local shelters are pretty awful. As the previous poster pointed out, many sell animals into vivisection. Animals in 20 counties in North Carolina are gassed because a vet on the state rabies board makes and sells gas chambers. In Oregon, they had to pass a state law forbidding shelters from using animals for fur. They still trap and sell cats to sell for class room disection in Portland.
So, it really just depends. Animals need voices in government just like everybody else. At least the HSUS doesn't grease palms. It is also not the "mindset" of people who support and /or donate to HSUS that they are a shelter. It sounds like you are the one who is being deceived, or more likely is trying to deceive.
Lobbying is a necessary
Unfortunately, the reality is that public policies determine many aspects of how we, and animals, must live our lives. That makes lobbying a necessary evil, and while shelters are of the utmost importance, someone must press to enact policies to stop animal cruelty at the commercial level. That is a reality that is beyond shelters' ability to address.
Anne Landman
Rick Berman attacks Humane Society
This is all propaganda, the Humane Society is a joke and so is the Rick Berman "attack"...I say this as an animal lover who has owned cats, dogs, birds and fish. Hunting has to be done with species. Here in NY the deer population is so high that they're everywhere. This past year, 12 deer were found frozen standing up huddled together. Tell me that's a better fate?
The Human Society in Texas sells your pets to the University of Texas for animal testing. After it was widely reported they claimed the stopped doing it! How can we be sure?
I've given to the Humane Society only to find out they've done such despicable and evil acts. The claim that animal testing is "necessary" is another lie. The torture and intentional hideous abuse labeled as "research" is anything but "humane".
Over 1200 "FDA" approved drugs that used millions of animals for testing have been taken off the shelves or recalled. Only to find out years later that they lied and hid test results.
So why does the Humane Society think animal testing is okay yet hunting is not?
Proof of these claims please?
Let's see your proof.
The Humane Society of the
The Humane Society of the U.S. campaigns to phase out and eventually eliminate all animal testing, for the sake of animals and humans, as do many humane groups, doctors and scientists. Animal testing is a money making scam, designed to push unsafe drugs out onto the market and keep vivisectionists employed. It is cruel, unnecessary and gives conflicting and useless data. 92 % of all drugs that pass animal tests, fail human trials. According to HSUS website:
"More than 150 million animals—including mice, rats, birds, fish, rabbits, guinea pigs, farm animals, dogs, cats, and non-human primates—are used as experimental subjects each year throughout the world. ....The Humane Society is committed to reducing that number to zero through the use of science, law, educational outreach, government lobbying, and the support of our more than 10 million members worldwide to promote more valid and humane methods of scientific research and product testing."
http://www.hsus.org/hsi/animal_experiments/animal_use_statistics/
See also HSUS positions on animal research:
http://www.hsus.org/animals_in_research/general_information_on_animal_research/hsus_position_statements/
HSUS does not run city and county humane societies, in Texas or anywhere else. If the HSUS does not support animal testing, they certainly don't support pound seizure. CCF 's main client, Phillip Morris tobacco, still does tons of animal testing. PM helped delay warnings on cigarettes for 20 years because of animal testing. They are big into monkey and dog torture. if CCF and PETA supported animal testing, they wouldn't be on CCF's hit list. One of the many reasons CCF attacks animal groups is because of their position on animal testing. The other one is food issues. CCF is very pro factory farming, meat, dairy, fast food , etc. HSUS has exposed a number of slaughter house and factory farm abuses. (Only the tip of the iceberg as they are all filthy hell holes.) The only time in history that slaughter house workers were prosecuted for animal cruelty, was after an HSUS investigation in 2008 of a California slaughter house. It was such a horror show it had to be closed down. It was supplying "USDA certified" meat for school lunches.
CCF is there to keep the propaganda machine going. Their one and only reason for existence is to do the dirty work for their corporate masters.
The other main opponents of the HSUS are the NRA and the hunting lobbies. Hunters are a loud minority. There is nothing "sporting" or necessary about shooting and trapping defenseless animals. Hunters don't simply shoot deer, they shoot wolves, coyotes, foxes, bears and other natural predators. They participate in many cruel methods of hunting, which can only be described as sadistic torture. That includes "canned" hunting; throwing coyotes and other animals into fenced enclosures so their dogs can "practice" on them by tearing them apart; steel leg hold traps; drowning sets and various other "fun" and sporting activities. Mother nature does not need hunters to thin out deer populations, she needs them to leave wild life alone and stop upsetting the balance by killing animals for "sport".
The hunters and the gun slingers are afraid of somebody taking their weapons away or telling them that can't shoot at anything that moves. Nobody can say anything nice about the HSUS or any animal group that doesn't send them into fits of sputtering rage. I hope the next time you watch the news and our daily blood bath of murder and mayhem, you think of the good folks at the NRA and a gun for every criminal that wants one! How ironic that groups responsible for so much death, who get their kicks out of shooting, maiming and tormenting animals, should call animal rights advocates "extremists".
I don't know who is feeding you this line, but it is irresponsible to simply repeat half baked propaganda. In the time it took you to post this disinformation on a public message board, you could have simply visited their website and found this out for yourself. It's not a case of which animals are important and which are not. All animals are suffering now. The last time I looked, they were all God's creatures.
HSUS
So, it is safe to assume that you are a vegan, wear and use only synthetic fibers? Nature doesn't need help controlling the deer population? You HAVE to be a city dweller. Spend some time in the woods (in every season) and THEN tell me that. Unless of course you think starvation is a preferred death because it is "natural"?
"So, it is safe to assume
Are cotton and linen synthetic?
Actually, it doesn't. It just doesn't always control them enough for human convenience.