Fox news is trying to paint Ron Paul as a no chance candidate, although he has massive support everywhere but on the TV news media. The disparity between TV and Internet has reached Orwellian proportion. It has become crystal clear that Fox News is attempting to hijack democracy in this way. Ron Paul has raised more $ from PEOPLE, not PHARMACEUTICAL lobbies. (who are major sponsors of Fox News) The Pharmas have a stake against Ron Paul as he is for stopping the continued RAPE of the American population with their $100 a bottle medicines (USA) that you can buy for a nickel in south america. I think we should list their sponsors, and contact them to let them know what they are paying to support. Down with FOX news for their shameful Facist Warmongering Fear-driven bull dung.
Can I get some help saving America here folks? THANKS AND GOD BLESS US ALL Check out our next president, RonPaul2008 (dot com)
It is unbelievable to me that that moron is doing so well in the polls. Just how simple minded and easily manipulated can the U.S. public be? Many people thought Reagan was the end of the world, and then Bush. I SWEAR that if the huckster wins the presidency, I am going to renounce my US citizenship and join the Lakota Sioux!
It boggles the mind to think that a piece of chocolate would be used to bribe legislators to accept coal as clean energy. The CO2 generated is part of the problem in global warming. Water, wind or solar power is clean, coal is dirty. What's beneath the chocolate covering? A bribe or a threat? Is this what our country has come down to, if the candidates berate coal, rather than accept the lie, they will be slimed?
This whole administration hates the science that relates to global warming, so the Santas will be allowed to pass out their Gift.
Fox news is trying to paint Ron Paul as a no chance candidate, although he has massive support everywhere but on the TV news media. The disparity between TV and Internet has reached Orwellian proportion. It has become crystal clear that Fox News is attempting to hijack democracy in this way. Ron Paul has raised more $ from PEOPLE, not PHARMACEUTICAL lobbies. (who are major sponsors of Fox News) The Pharmas have a stake against Ron Paul as he is for stopping the continued RAPE of the American population with their $100 a bottle medicines (USA) that you can buy for a nickel in south america. I think we should list their sponsors, and contact them to let them know what they are paying to support. Down with FOX news for their shameful Facist Warmongering Fear-driven bull dung.
Can I get some help saving America here folks? THANKS AND GOD BLESS US ALL Check out our next president, RonPaul2008 (dot com)
David Paul
It is unbelievable to me that that moron is doing so well in the polls. Just how simple minded and easily manipulated can the U.S. public be? Many people thought Reagan was the end of the world, and then Bush. I SWEAR that if the huckster wins the presidency, I am going to renounce my US citizenship and join the Lakota Sioux!
squint, and keep them focused on the "cross" for 15 minutes, and you'll see it:
IN HOC SIGNO VINCES
It boggles the mind to think that a piece of chocolate would be used to bribe legislators to accept coal as clean energy. The CO2 generated is part of the problem in global warming. Water, wind or solar power is clean, coal is dirty. What's beneath the chocolate covering? A bribe or a threat? Is this what our country has come down to, if the candidates berate coal, rather than accept the lie, they will be slimed?
This whole administration hates the science that relates to global warming, so the Santas will be allowed to pass out their Gift.
Isn't that an oxymoron?
What is good about propaganda? What makes one propaganda better than another?
Given that a lie, or deceptionn is inherent in propaganda, ...
Is it the veracity, or the lack thereof, of the message conveyed which makes it good? Or is it the facility by which the lie is promulaged?
Does the qualification of "good", "better", or "best" promote and validate the lie itself, or the technique?
These are serious questions for serious users of specific language, such as propagandists and those who intend to expose them.
Sadly, I couldn't find this reference on the USC Center on Public Diplomacy website.
Pages