Senate Bank Reform Bill One Vote Short

Sheriff badgeThe fate of the Wall Street reform bill is up in the air after the death of Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia. The bill is a single confirmed vote short of the 60 votes needed to get past a threatened filibuster by Senate Republicans. From day one, the Bankster team has supported the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) and that is still one of the strongest pieces of the bill. It is a great time to send off the last emails to Senators telling them to put a new cop on the block in the form of a CFPB.

Tell Us What You Think of the Bill

We want to hear from you about what you think of the bill, and what grade you would give it if you were a kindergarten teacher grading Congress on its performance. Conceptually, the bill breaks down into three main parts.

1. Consumer Protection
The section dealing with the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is very strong. The Bureau has independent regulatory and enforcement authority over a wide array of consumer financial products such as credit cards, mortgages, and even payday loans. Unfortunately, auto dealers escaped its jurisdiction, but there is no doubt the CFPB will be a new cop on the block policing the safety and soundness of common consumer products. Consumer advocate Elizabeth Warren, who first floated the idea of a CFPB two years ago, is happy with the final result. What grade would you give this section of the bill?

2. Ending the Casino
Warren Buffet's famous "weapons of financial mass destruction," also known as over the counter derivatives, will be holstered. In a big win for reformers, large Wall Street firms engaged in speculative food and energy derivatives trading will be forced to spin off their derivatives desks into a separately capitalized affiliate, making speculation in these markets much more costly. In addition, all trades will be cleared by regulators and exchange-traded where pricing and positions will be transparent. Capital requirements and margin requirements will apply, putting real money behind the bets. Position limits will apply, making it more difficult for a few players to dominate the market. Though we lost the battle to apply this "spin off" provision to all derivatives trading, the fact that energy and food is covered is a big win for American consumers and small African nations. Former Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC} Chair Brooksley Born, who tried to get derivatives regulated way back in 1999, is happy with this section of the bill. What grade would you give this section of the bill?

3. "Too Big to Fail"
It is with the big-picture structural issues that the bill falls short. It is true that the new bill will apply tighter capital and leveraging requirements, but these decisions are left to future regulators and international negotiations in Basel, Switzerland. Reformers succeeded in getting a strengthened "Volcker Rule" into the bill, banning proprietary trading and conflict-of-interest trading, but it was weakened by a hedge fund loophole. Reformers succeeded in getting a pretty solid audit of the Federal Reserve, but the bill will not end "too big to fail" because taxpayers are still on the hook for big bank failures. Big banks were not forced to prepay into a fund for future bailouts, and taxpayer subsidies for the big banks were not ended. Too-big-to-fail institutions were not shrunk in size (either with a size cap or a comprehensive derivatives spin-off proposal). Glass-Steagall was not restored. Destructive "naked" credit default swaps were not banned. At the end of the day, Treasury Secretary Tim Geithner is happy with this result. What grade would you give this section of the bill?

If these were separate bills, they would amount to three easy votes. But because they are lumped together, things get a bit complicated. Tell us what you think, and we will issue a Bankster scorecard next week.

Mary Bottari

Mary Bottari is a reporter for the Center for Media and Democracy (CMD). She helped launch CMD's award-winning ALEC Exposed investigation and is a two-time recipient of the Sidney Prize for public interest journalism from the Sidney Hillman Foundation.


1. B+, to rank an A it should be outside the Fed. 2. C+, it should prohibit pension funds, IRAs ( which are mostly mutual funds) & 401Ks from purchasing derivatives. 3. D+, without Glass-Steagall it is a terrible bill.

B for the consumer protections portion. I like Elizabeth Warren from watching her with Bill Moyers, so if she is happy about the bill's consumer protections, that makes me happy. B for the portion to end the casino. I read about Brooksley Born in stories at a wiki and she is an amazing person. I am glad to know she is satisfied. F for not getting the assignment finished. Glass Stegall is needed to the protect the taxpayers. Tim Geithner's happiness is understandable. What is an audit of the Federal reserve and how does it help us knowing what we are doing?

And the perfect is the enemy of the good here. It's not perfect so out with it. Too bad this argument is adopted, since it is the one the Repugnicans have been using to thwart every single initiative the Obama Administration has brought forward. Too bad so many Democrats and Independents are falling for it.

I just feel as if these reforms and idea are way overdue in America...this is truly the product of everyone being out for themselves, even our elected officials who swear to represent the common people when they are elected. Reform and change should have been enacted under Bush and the Republicans in 2006-2007 when this problem reared it's ugly head...