Reply to: This Is Going to Hurt: What Your Doctor Doesn't Say Can Cost You
The doctor did not give this patient the boot "for free", he charged $500. She paid for that out of pocket. How does that equate to "free"? Did you not learn to read at some point in medical school?
Reply to: Watchdog Groups Call for Access to All Records of SCOTUS Nominee Kavanaugh
Good. brett is an enemy of the people & MUST be treated as such. He has NO BUSINESS on any bench. NONE. He deserves to be treated with scorn, contempt, and ridicule.
Reply to: ALEC Launches Effort to Protect Gerrymandering from Judges
ALEC needs NOT to exist anymore. They HATE this country and are worthless.
Reply to: Tallahassee Mayor Defends Local Democracy from the Gun Lobby
Good for the mayor. Guns have NO place in a public park. NONE. Some of you here NEED to get that. If the citizens DON'T want them in their park, it is their RIGHT to do so. The nra does not like it, all the more reason to do so. They NEED to suck it up, buttercup & get OVER it.
Reply to: Broad Coalition Calls on Corporations to Drop Funding for ALEC Over Horowitz Speeches
Now you're labeling obeying the Constitution as "dangerous"??? I agree the plan ALEC proposes is incorrect but dangerous is hardly the word to use in describing an effort to obey the Constitution. If it is correct, then it follows the left believes disobedience to the Constitution is "safe" or "acceptable" behavior of both the government and individual. How then can you attack Mr. Horowitz as the basic premise of your attack is he incites speeches which, in the final analysis, offend rights guaranteed in the Constitution and thus obeyed but which you say doing so is "dangerous." Frankly, I just don't see your logic. Go to www.foavc.org and learn the facts of public record about a convention. It is not "dangerous."