I have not seen any mention of the public health system aims to make customers out of insurance companies, reducing their spending due to unnecessary layoffs and reduced bonuses paid to executives due to decreased benefits. My point is, nothing works, unless insurance companies to be part of the solution. The debate has been all about the government, the uninsured, and cost savings from suppliers, including <a href="http://paraorkut9.org/">recados para orkut</a> pharmecuticals. When insurance companies have been in this debate? strangely silent, I would keep. In my opinion, their piece of the market must be significantly eroded achieve real savings. Have to make significant cuts to the structures of their earnings, or anything else of this work.
"Then there should be no problem NOT making bogus health claims to sell the product."
Like I already said, take a good look around the internet, and go try locking everyone up selling a fortune cookie.
"Well...in the sense that "Everybody does it, why don't you go pick on someone else?" is a p***-poor defense...hey, you're right! :-)"
That's not what my argument is at all. Try reading. Try thinking, for that matter.
Anyways, at this point, I think YOU'RE a scammer. You're trying to divert the discussion from -- something else I ALREADY said - the point about one of these geniuses who plotted out a deep pocket lawsuit, went out and bought a 4.95 bracelet, and started a very frivolous suit.
I think you're one of those "genuises" at this point. So you know what? Go take a hike. Arguing with you is pointless. You don't even make a semblance of trying to respond to what someone is actually saying.
I'm sure you will lose your bogus scamming lawsuit. Every judge in the country will laugh you out of the courtroom.
The one claim shown on that page as of right now -- "Performance Tech Designed To Work With Your Energy Field" -- is in a sponsored link to www.PowerBalance.com. In case you don't know what a sponsored link is, Amazon has thoughtfully provide a "What's This?" link to an explanation of the term.
Yes, Amazon gets revenue from sponsored links -- tsk-tsk, Amazon, for this one -- but it's not Amazon that's promoting them as magical products.
You're probably one of the claimants in this ridiculous deep pocket law suit: you bought a bracelet for 4.95 and are now sueing the athletes just as you planned from the beginning of YOUR scam."
Funny, neither this PRWatch item nor the Australian source it derived from --
-- makes any mention of a lawsuit. Are you by any chance having a PR senior moment?
If there were a lawsuit, you'd have no more proof of my being a claimant than I have of your being, say, a paid shill for those deep pockets suckering shallow pockets. But if such a suit is planned or in progress, I have no other interest in it than hoping it teaches those particular deep pockets a memorable lesson.
"IF there were a lawsuit"
What a FBS artist you are. It's all over the internet on a google, just like Ouija Boards.
Poor, poor baby. You bought a 4.95 bracelet and it didn't heal you.
"Then there should be no problem NOT making bogus health claims to sell the product."
Like I already said, take a good look around the internet, and go try locking everyone up selling a fortune cookie.
"Well...in the sense that "Everybody does it, why don't you go pick on someone else?" is a p***-poor defense...hey, you're right! :-)"
That's not what my argument is at all. Try reading. Try thinking, for that matter.
Anyways, at this point, I think YOU'RE a scammer. You're trying to divert the discussion from -- something else I ALREADY said - the point about one of these geniuses who plotted out a deep pocket lawsuit, went out and bought a 4.95 bracelet, and started a very frivolous suit.
I think you're one of those "genuises" at this point. So you know what? Go take a hike. Arguing with you is pointless. You don't even make a semblance of trying to respond to what someone is actually saying.
I'm sure you will lose your bogus scamming lawsuit. Every judge in the country will laugh you out of the courtroom.
That makes a lot of sense, but since when do religious fanatics accept anything that is logical.
Sorry, I'm still here.
And it wasn't strictly speaking a reference; I just said "Check Amazon."
But here's a reference:
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Daps&field-keywords=powere+balance+bracelet&x=0&y=0
The one claim shown on that page as of right now -- "Performance Tech Designed To Work With Your Energy Field" -- is in a sponsored link to www.PowerBalance.com. In case you don't know what a sponsored link is, Amazon has thoughtfully provide a "What's This?" link to an explanation of the term.
Yes, Amazon gets revenue from sponsored links -- tsk-tsk, Amazon, for this one -- but it's not Amazon that's promoting them as magical products.
Funny, neither this PRWatch item nor the Australian source it derived from --
http://www.bizcommunity.com/Article/196/12/55645.html
-- makes any mention of a lawsuit. Are you by any chance having a PR senior moment?
If there were a lawsuit, you'd have no more proof of my being a claimant than I have of your being, say, a paid shill for those deep pockets suckering shallow pockets. But if such a suit is planned or in progress, I have no other interest in it than hoping it teaches those particular deep pockets a memorable lesson.
Pages