A new Indiana University study concludes that [3] "news reports by television reporters embedded [4] with American troops in the early days of the Iraq War [5] found little support for critics who question the journalists' objectivity." However, according to the study's abstract [6], the measure of objectivity was "the use of personal pronouns in embedded and nonembedded reports during CNN [7] coverage of the 'Shock and Awe [8]' campaign" and "the context in which personal pronouns were used by embedded reporters." While "there was more frequent use of personal pronouns by embedded reporters," the researchers judged the reports to be "void of personal values and ideologies." Whether embedded reporters were more or less likely to include the perspectives of Iraqis, United Nations [9] officials, or war critics is not addressed. The media watchgroup FAIR [10] has documented [11] that U.S. television coverage of Iraq is "dominated by government and military officials."