I have a question and forgive my ignorance, I only followed the trial superficially. How is the absence of "duty to retreat" relevant if an assailant interferes with your ability to retreat? Correct me if I'm wrong, but to my knowledge Martin was on top of Zimmerman when the shot was fired.
You're a jealous hater! Everything Shauna writes is the Bible, as far as I'm concerned! If I had a job or a car I'd use it to find out where you live and give you a thorough talking-to, mister! Shauna, don't listen to them, they are jealous of your great beauty and talent!
So you want to return to the Jim Crow laws which require a person to run away before defending themselves, and then strip them of the protection of Innocent-Until-Proven-Guilty. Those laws were put into place so that if the chosen victim of a lynch mob defended himself by killing one of the Klansmen looking to string him up, he would be strung up by the courts.
So the 1911A1 carried by, engraved and given to a Medal of Honor recipient isn't a keepsake? When President Theodore Roosevelt's stolen Peacemaker showed up in a buyback, should it have been destroyed?
That would be bad for you Jim Crow gun law supporters, when most people had guns, and carried them, and the murder rate was less than 1 per 100,000. You people need blood flowing in the streets, like in 1980, when the laws were at their strictest and the murder rate was 10.7 per 100,000.
You can't stand it that there are fewer murders and gun shot wound deaths now than when gun control was stricter, which is why you want gun control to be stricter. You love the effects of your "Gun Free Zones", because you get lots of blood there, like the theater in Aurora, and Newtown.
Pages