Add new comment

Do you have any credible, sourced information "about Judge Lynn Adelmann and activities that he might have attended that involved liberal political donors, such as George Soros?" Do you? My real guess is that you don't. My real guess is that, if you did, you would have put it in your comment. Instead, in the absence of credible and sourced information, you simply put a question out there from which people might well infer that Judge Adelmann had attended events funded by Mr. Soros. That is how a smear starts. And the American Right-Wing has perfected the process. Without accusing someone of anything, they simply plant what seems to be an innocent rhetorical question and do so in such a way that those so inclined might well infer there is truth to it. Before you know it, it has become a meme and taken on a life of its own, though there may be zero substance to what it "charges." Before you ask rhetorical questions such as this one, perhaps you'll do your own research. That way, if you can't dig up anything to use against the person you want to smear, perhaps you'll think twice about smearing him/her. Now, let me ask again: Do you have any information about Judge Adelmann? If not, why not apologize for raising an issue that you can't even verify is actually an issue?