Add new comment

Several of the justices have been profiting personally from their public positions by publishing memoirs. Here's a case where the supreme court erred by letting a ring of drug dealers go free because they did not read the facts of the case. http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-1259.pdf "It is important to be clear about what occurred in this case: The Government physically occupied private property for the purpose of obtaining information. "- page 4 But PAGES 1 AND 2 SAY THAT THE GOVT OBTAINED A WARRANT FOR DC. SO THE DC EVIDENCE SHOULD HAVE BEEN ALLOWED. IF THE GOVT DIDN'T OBTAIN A WARRANT FOR MD, THEN THE MD EVIDENCE SHOULD HAVE BEEN EXCLUDED.