Add new comment

Prosser and the other Koch cronies have a very well thought out strategy: If the political group - lets call it Koch Suckas of America, donates $100,000.00 to the Prosser campaign, and it does not have to be disclosed, Prosser no longer has an ethical dilemna if he has to hear a case brougt by Koch Suckas of America, because he would not know that they gave him the money. Get it? Ignorance is bliss. Prosser could pretend to be impartial, and hand the Koch Suckas the decision they paid for becuase no one can ever say he took money from Koch Suckas of America. All Prosser has to do now is sign the opinion sitting on his desk written by an associate at the Troupis firm that says it is a violation of free speach to force the disclosure of names of politcal dollar donars donors and we are on our way to fascisim - one nation under Koch. I'm sure that Troupis, as a lawyer is disgusted by this to, but he is paid good money to forget about those nasty ethics that keep creeping up on him. On another point, maybe someone can tell me why corporations can have free speach, but cannot be put in prison when they put out products that they know will kill people. It is silly to think that a corporation can speak. The corporation is not speaking, the people who run it are. Just like in murder, the corporation is not doing the killing when it puts out a Ford Pinto (Ford knew it would explode if crashed into, but hid the facts, and decided it would be cheaper to pay the families of dead people than to recall the car) the ceo and the other decision makers are the murderers. If corporations want free speach, lets give them the other freedoms to, like the freedom to spend your life in jail when they decide the profit line favors dead people over safety. Wisconsin is open for business all right, and in four years when the Kochs are gone with all of our money, we will pay for the ruin they left.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.