Add new comment

Should one assume that by making the comments you have against Ian Murphy, you are justifying the alledged actions of Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker, which if taken at face value also implicate the Koch brothers, David and Charles. While it may be argued that Ian Murphy may be in breach of laws pertaining to identity theft, if it can be shown he gained from this act, your other comments referring to Ian Murphy being; "a liar, a trickster, morally bankrupt, filth-mouthed man bent on destroying a man with trickery..., cannot be morally, nor I would argue, legally justified. I would suggest Ms McLaughlin, that you re-consider the facts and reveiw the implications of such rhetoric in light of what may be shown to be serious issues of influence of elected officials that falls foul of established legal guidelines.