|
|
NavigationTopicsUser login |
rhetoricHas Fake News Become the Real News?Topics: democracy | education | Iraq | journalism | left wing | media | politics | propaganda | pundits | rhetoric | right wing | secrecy | war/peace
"Voluntary Marketing Standards" Mask Marketing RealityTopics: children | corporate social responsibility | corporations | ethics | health | international | marketing | propaganda | rhetoric | tobacco
McClellan and the Ethics of SpinSubmitted by Sheldon Rampton on Thu, 06/05/2008 - 09:29.
Topics: ethics | Iraq | journalism | propaganda | public relations | rhetoric | U.S. government John Stodder has written the most interesting commentary I've seen from within the public relations industry about former Bush administration press secretary Scott McClellan's new book. It's interesting in part because Stodder is an interesting figure. For those who remember this sort of thing, he was one of two executives at the Fleishman-Hillard PR firm (the other was Douglas Dowie) who were convicted in May 2006 of multiple counts of conspiracy and fraud in a scheme to overbill the city of Los Angeles for public relations consulting services. Notwithstanding the verdict, Stodder continues to maintain his innocence and remains free while he appeals the conviction. Apparently this has left him with some time to contemplate ethical matters, and he disapproves of what he sees in McClellan, whose "disloyalty strikes me as most amoral." Moreover, Stodder worries that McClellan's criticism of his former boss "is undermining whatever remaining credibility the PR industry can claim for itself." McCain's Pastor Problems Deepen, WidenTopics: politics | religion | rhetoric | right wing | social justice | Election 2008
Businesses Lobby During "Earth Month" to Protect Plastic BagsTopics: advertising | corporate campaigns | corporate social responsibility | corporations | environment | ethics | front groups | lobbying | propaganda | public relations | rhetoric
How to Swift Boat Barack Obama?Topics: internet | politics | race/ethnic issues | rhetoric | Election 2008
Republican strategists are salivating over the "inflammatory sermons by Obama's pastor" Jeremiah Wright. They believe that Wright's sermons "offer the party a pathway to victory if Obama emerges as the Democratic nominee. Not only will the video clips enable some elements of the party to define him as unpatriotic, they will also serve as a powerful motivating force for the conservative base." Notwithstanding Obama's highly praised speech on race yesterday, the videos of Wright's sermons have "convinced some that, after months of praying for Hillary Clinton and the automatic enmity which she arouses, that they may actually have easier prey." According to Micah Sifry, "Obama's speech is a great test of the following question: Are we still living in the age of sound-bite politics, where the sharp attack line, even taken out of context, can become the 'truth' of an event or a person thanks to the amplifying and distorting effects of broadcast media? Or are we entering the age of sound-blast politics, where a 37-minute speech can actually be watched, read, and digested by millions of people (a million views already on YouTube!) using the abundant spaces of the internet -- and the themes and meanings they encounter and absorb will be not about the 'politics' of a speech, but its actual content? In other words, are we entering an age when politicians can be judged not by the color of their skin, but by the content of their character?" The Rhetoric BeatTopics: Iraq | journalism | politics | rhetoric | terrorism
Language plays a powerful role in shaping political decisions, argues Brent Cunningham. As an example, he points to the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, "when the choice of words -- by the press and government officials -- played a crucial role in setting America on a course that led, ultimately, to our military action in Iraq. ... The decision to describe the attacks in the language of 'war,' rather than as a criminal act, emerged swiftly and organically in the earliest press accounts, and was quickly solidified and extended by President Bush and other administration officials." If the attacks had been defined using other language, such as "mass murder," this might also have defined the "terms of the response" differently, "within the domain of police investigation, criminal justice and the safeguards of law." Cunningham thinks that "journalism needs a rhetoric beat" focused on studying the uses and abuses of language, which "has emerged as a central issue in our political culture." Fine-Tuning the Sell Job for the Next WarTopics: international | lobbying | public relations | rhetoric | right wing | war/peace
Melanie Morgan Still Wants to KillTopics: Defend the Press | human rights | Iraq | journalism | rhetoric | right wing
A year ago, Melanie Morgan of the Move America Forward front group publicly fantasized about having New York Times editor Bill Keller sent to the gas chamber or the electric chair (she couldn't decide which). In a recent appearance on MSNBC's Hardball with Chris Matthews, Morgan repeated her claim that Keller and other journalists who reported on the government's SWIFT program for tracking terrorist bank transactions "should be tried for treason. If they were found guilty of treason, I would have no problem with them being executed." Bush Approval Hits New LowTopics: politics | rhetoric | U.S. government
|
Weekly SpinRecent blog posts
Upcoming events |