|
|
NavigationTopicsUser login |
Spin of the Day: March 05, 2008March 5, 2008Group Blogging for the Man (and Fleishman-Hillard)Topics: corporations | internet | lobbying | marketing | public relations
British PR Industry Doing Jolly WellTopics: activism | internet | marketing | public relations
"I can't recall a time when PR has been as strong," Sir Martin Sorrell, the head of the UK-based marketing and public relations conglomerate WPP, told the Guardian. "Something has changed and the reason for the change is online activity, where personal recommendation and personal communication have become more important." Users of social networking sites like MySpace, YouTube and Facebook are averse to advertising, but often happy to pass along "seemingly 'independent'" reviews and opinions planted by PR pros. In Britain, the PR industry "employs some 48,000 people, and is second only to that of the U.S. in size," according to a 2005 study. Since then, industry growth has "been estimated at more than 10% a year, with predictions of more double-digit growth this year." The head of Britain's largest PR firm, Chime Communications, said, "Reputation management is now equally or more important than brand management and, as a result, there is a gradual shift of budget into public relations." More money for PR means more spin aimed at journalists, as UK-based watchdog groups like SpinWatch and Media Standards Trust know well. Media Standards Trust "is developing a tool to allow the public to compare a news article with a corresponding press release." Few Scientists Warm to Skeptics ConferenceTopics: corporations | front groups | global warming | science | think tanks
The Heartland Institute's "2008 International Conference on Climate Change" in New York was "a sort of global warming doppelganger conference, where everything was reversed," reports Juliet Eilperin. At the event, skeptics unveiled their response to the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). The Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) report, edited by corporate-funded skeptic Fred Singer, argued that "recent climate change stems from natural causes." Eilperin notes that "while the IPCC enlisted several hundred scientists from more than 100 countries to work over five years to produce its series of reports, the NIPCC document is the work of 23 authors from 15 nations, some of them not scientists." The New York Times reports that while the Heartland conference "was largely framed around science ... when an organizer made an announcement asking all of the scientists in the large hall to move to the front for a group picture, 19 men did so." The conference invitation identified its goal as "to generate international media attention to the fact that many scientists believe forecasts of rapid warming and catastrophic events are not supported by sound science." The Heartland Institute offered "$1,000 to those willing to give a talk," and "a free weekend at the Marriott Marquis in Manhattan, including travel costs, to all elected officials wanting to attend," according to the RealClimate blog. Anti-Taxation with Tobacco RepresentationTopics: corporations | democracy | ethics | front groups | health | lobbying | secrecy | third party technique | tobacco
Featured Participatory Project: Join Huffington Post Readers in More Superdelegate Muckraking on CongresspediaTopics: citizen journalism | democracy | Election 2008
Now we need YOU to help move this information into Congresspedia so that the public can know just who these people are that may be picking our next president. It only takes a minute and no experience - technical or political - is necessary. It should also be noted that, unlike the superdelegate counts from the major news organizations, the Superdelegate Transparency Project is the only fully transparent, fully sourced count of superdelegates anywhere, and it's all due to the work of citizens like you. You can join this effort by taking a minute to help out with our current task of moving the information from the Huffington Post. There's full instructions and support at the project's "help out" page. Coal Lobby Gets Down and DirtyTopics: advertising | environment | front groups | global warming | issue management
"It's our job to keep coal at the table. It's not there now," said Bob Henrie, a principal in the Salt Lake-based advertising and public relations firm R&R Partners. In September last year, Henrie's firm won the contract with the National Mining Association and other mining industry lobby groups to develop a $35 million advertising campaign aimed at improving the coal mining industry's image. The ads are being run by Americans for Balanced Energy Choices (ABEC), a front group which initially had its domain name registered by the coal industry trade organization, the Center for Energy and Economic Development. Late last year an analysis of ABEC's claims, published by the Center for American Progress Action Fund, accused the front group of having a "dirty agenda," running "dirty ads" and using "dirty political targeting" to promote "dirty lies." In his biographical note, Henrie boasts that he was once the chief of staff of the House Mines and Mining Subcommittee which involved him working "to protect vital mining legislation." |
Weekly SpinRecent blog posts
The Politics and PR of Cervical CancerA four-article series by CMD's Associate Director, Judith Siers-Poisson. Upcoming events |