- Reports
- Lisa Graves
- Mary Bottari
- Wendell Potter
- Brendan Fischer
- Rebekah Wilce
- Sara Jerving
- Harriet Rowan
- Jonathan Rosenblum
- Will Dooling
- Emily Osborne
- Abdul Raziq
- Guest Contributor
- Archives
- Alex Carlin
- Anne Landman
- Bob Burton
- Chelsea Lawliss
- Diane Farsetta
- Eric Carlson
- Jennifer Page
- Jessica Opoien
- Jill Richardson
- John Stauber
- Judith Siers-Poisson
- Maxwell Abbott
- Megha Desai
- Monica Chang
- Osasumwen Izevbigie
- Patrick Moran
- Rebecca Sandler
- Ross Wolfarth
- Sarah Olson
- Sheldon Rampton
- Steve Horn
- Take Action
- Latest News
- Media
- SourceWatch
- Publications
- About Us
- Why Donate?
The Path to a Pink Slip
As a reporter for Environmental Science and Technology (ES&T), a small industry trade publication, Paul Thacker discovered an entire industry built around spinning science for the purpose of confusing the public while benefiting big business. He wrote exposés documenting the tobacco and oil industry ties of Steven Milloy's junkscience.com, which purports to debunk bad science about issues such as global warming. He uncovered the $2.9 million media campaign behind "Project Protect," a front group for the timber industry that represented itself as an organization of concerned citizens in Oregon. But when he began writing about the Weinberg Group, an international scientific and regulatory consulting firm specializing in "product defense" for the chemical industry, he ran afoul of the American Chemical Society, which publishes ES&T. A few months later, after unearthing evidence that the White House tried to prevent scientists from speaking out about the link between climate change and the increasing strength of hurricanes, he was fired from his job.




