- Reports
- Lisa Graves
- Mary Bottari
- Wendell Potter
- Brendan Fischer
- Rebekah Wilce
- Sara Jerving
- Harriet Rowan
- Jonathan Rosenblum
- Will Dooling
- Emily Osborne
- Abdul Raziq
- Guest Contributor
- Archives
- Alex Carlin
- Anne Landman
- Bob Burton
- Chelsea Lawliss
- Diane Farsetta
- Eric Carlson
- Jennifer Page
- Jessica Opoien
- Jill Richardson
- John Stauber
- Judith Siers-Poisson
- Maxwell Abbott
- Megha Desai
- Monica Chang
- Osasumwen Izevbigie
- Patrick Moran
- Rebecca Sandler
- Ross Wolfarth
- Sarah Olson
- Sheldon Rampton
- Steve Horn
- Take Action
- Latest News
- Media
- SourceWatch
- Publications
- About Us
- Why Donate?
Iraq Study Group Suggests Accurate Counting of Iraqi Deaths
The Iraq Study Group's report states, "There is significant underreporting of the violence in Iraq" by the U.S. military. The too-high "standard for recording attacks acts as a filter to keep events out of reports and databases," as well as news stories, according to Editor & Publisher. Examples of unreported attacks include "a roadside bomb or a rocket or mortar attack that doesn't hurt U.S. personnel" and a "sectarian attack" by an unknown group. In addition, "a murder of an Iraqi is not necessarily counted as an attack." On one day in July 2006, only 93 violent acts were officially recorded, when some 1,100 actually occurred, according to the report. "Good policy is difficult to make when information is systematically collected in a way that minimizes its discrepancy with policy goals," it concludes. One recommendation is to "institute immediate changes in the collection of data about violence and the sources of violence in Iraq to provide a more accurate picture of events on the ground."
Main Source:
Editor & Publisher, December 6, 2006 




