PR Watch, First Quarter 1996, Volume 3, No. 1

Flack Attack

by John C. Stauber and Sheldon Rampton

PR executive Jack Mongoven has a new name for the leftist/environmentalist conspiracy that threatens to destroy civilization as we know it. He calls it the "Precautionary Principle."

"The Precautionary Principle holds that a manufacturer must prove that its product does no harm, before it can be marketed," Mongoven wrote in the March 1995 issue of Eco-logic, an anti-environmentalist newsletter.

Apocalypse Cow: U.S. Denials Deepen Mad Cow Danger

by John C. Stauber and Sheldon Rampton

For seven years the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and the multi-billion dollar animal livestock industry have cooperated in a PR cover-up of huge health risks to animals and people in the United States.

For 10 years, even preceding the British outbreak of Mad Cow Disease, the USDA has had scientific evidence that a version of the disease exists in U.S.

USDA's PR Strategy

|

USDA's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) 1991 Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy Public Relations

The following extracts are from a government PR strategy document for handling the Mad Cow Disease problem in the United State. The document was obtained through a Freedom of Information Act investigation.

With BSE there are two issues where agriculture is vulnerable to media scrutiny. These are the practice of feeding rendered ruminant products to ruminants and the risk to human health.


A Decade of Denial: Chronology of the Mad Cow Cover-Up

by John C. Stauber and Sheldon Rampton

1985

Dr. Richard F. Marsh, a TSE expert and researcher at the University of Wisconsin in Madison, investigates a Wisconsin mink herd wiped out by a transmissible spongiform encephalopathy (TSE) disease picked up from their feed--"downer" dairy cattle. He notifies colleagues of the apparent presence in dairy cows of a TSE agent, publishes peer-reviewed papers and launches a decade of continuing research.

1986

Seven cases are reported of a new spongiform encephalopathy called "Mad Cow Disease" in British cattle.

1987

England reports 413 new cases of Mad Cow Disease.

Incineration of British cows infected with Mad Cow Disease.
Photo (c) David Jackson

1988

Another 2,185 cases of the disease are confirmed.

1989

The USDA quietly forms a committee to review the situation in the United States.

Rendering: the "Invisible Industry" Gets a Green Facelift

by John C. Stauber and Sheldon Rampton

The U.S. Department of Agriculture calls "rendering" a process of heat-treating fat, bone, offal and related material derived from the carcasses of livestock, poultry, fish and used cooking fats and oils. Renderers call themselves "the invisible industry" and are thankful that most people remain blissfully unaware of their existence.

Each year, at hundreds of plants in the U.S., more than 12.5 million tons of dead animals, fat and meat waste are melted down, most of it to become protein supplements fed to pets, chickens, cows, sheep and other animals, the rest to make products ranging from gelatin to cosmetics.

When "the invisible industry" needs to speak, it hires PR experts.

PR Watch Reviews BSE-related Resources on the Internet

Reporting in PR Watch

    USDA's Mad Cow PR Coverup
    The 1st Quarter 1996 issue of PR Watch reviews a decade of efforts by the British and U.S. governments to deny BSE-related public health risks.
    Shut Up and Eat: The Oprah Winfrey Lawsuit Brings Food Censorship to America
    A lawsuit by Texas cattlemen against Oprah Winfrey marks the first test in court of new "agricultural product disparagement" laws which give the food industry unprecedented new powers to sue, harass and silence its critics. The lawsuit accuses Oprah and one of her guests of harming beef sales by publicly discussing industry practices such as animal cannibalism which created the mad cow epidemic in England. The 2nd Quarter 1997 issue of PR Watch examines the background of "disparagement laws" and also provides a full transcript of what was said on the Oprah show.
    Swallowing Anything: The Hype Behind Alternative Remedies
    The 3rd Quarter 1997 documents the use of risky materials such as bovine brain tissue in over-the-counter "health food supplements," in the context of PR and lobbying by the food supplement industry aimed at escaping government oversight and labeling requirements. It also documents a number of little-known risk factors in the United States related to a potential TSE disease outbreak here.
    One Hundred Percent All Beef Baloney: Lessons of the Oprah Trial
    Oprah Winfrey has won her case in court against Texas cattlemen, but the deeper issues behind the trial remain unresolved. For an analysis of the trial and its chilling impact on public discussion of food safety, read this PR Watch report.

Confidence Game: Burson-Marsteller's PR Plan for Silicone Breast Implants

|

by John C. Stauber and Sheldon Rampton

Once reviled as corporate villains, the manufacturers of silicone breast implants have made a stunning comeback recently in the court of public opinion. A series of scientific studies and news stories have emerged, arguing that breast implants are in fact harmless, and that companies such as Dow Corning and Bristol-Myers are hapless victims of misguided women, greedy attorneys and manipulated juries.

This turnaround is no accident.

Science Under Pressure: Dow-Funded Studies Say 'No Problem!'

| |

by John C. Stauber and Sheldon Rampton

Breast implant makers and plastic surgeons have spent vastly more money on PR, attorneys, and lobbying than the women who are suing them for damages. Thanks to PR, the industry has achieved a remarkable reversal, persuading large sectors of the news media that it is the victim of politics, greed and "junk science."

New York Times reporter Gina Kolata has typified the trend, penning stories such as "Implant Lawsuits Create a Medical Rush to Cash In," which portrays the 400,000 women who have joined a class-action lawsuit against the industry as greedy opportunists goaded on by slick attorneys.

Beauty and the Breast: How Industry Sold Implants to Women

|

by John C. Stauber and Sheldon Rampton

Juries which have issued multi-million-dollar judgments against Dow Corning have based their verdicts on evidence beginning with the first known instances in which silicone was used for breast enlargement.

Following World War II, Japanese bargirls found that their G.I. customers preferred big bosoms, so they attempted to enlarge their breasts with injections of industrial-grade liquid silicone.