Recent comments

  • Reply to: The Best War Ever: Lies, Damned Lies and the Mess in Iraq   17 years 9 months ago
    Of course not all PR people are untrustworthy, but I for one wish that the honest ones would speak out more assertively. You talk about advocacy. If the PR industry as a whole were truly honest, the clients with harmful agendas would have a much harder time finding "advocacy" for hire. This advocacy isn't like that for criminal defendants, who are entitled by law to representation. There's no law that says anyone with an agenda is entitled to PR services. <i>"Don't confuse spin with advocacy."</i> Well, let's see: I think of an advocate as someone who speaks out in the open for a particular person or cause. You know who he is and for whom and what he is speaking; you know his own stake in the matter if he has one. But a spinner works in secret to manipulate what gets printed, broadcast and talked about. Often the agenda he's promoting has no obvious connection to the overt matter it's inserted into; the idea is just to plant thoughts or change attitudes without the targeted audience even noticing it. Usually the spinner would hate to have his role in the undertaking publically known, because that would shatter the illusion he seeks to create, and the whole thing wouldn't look so good to the people he's trying to influence. If truth and justice are ever well served under such conitions, it's more likely by chance than by design. I would love to see high-profile industry groups like "PR Professionals Against Homelessness" or "PR Professionals Against Militarism." But I'm not holding my breath, for the simple reason that these hired "advocates" mostly go where the money is, just like anyone else with services to sell. This or that firm may take on this or that pro bono project now and then, but, when you get down to it, there really isn't much money in promoting progressive political and social policies. It's the people with the money who would have to accept the limitations on their accumulations of power and wealth that progressive policies entail. As they say, money talks. But contrary to the saying, b.s. doesn't walk; it usually flies luxury class. This, as I understand it, is the imbalance that CMD is working to rectify. If their work doesn't satisfy your own idea of "balance," you may have to resign yourself to looking elsewhere.
  • Reply to: The Best War Ever: Lies, Damned Lies and the Mess in Iraq   17 years 9 months ago
    The issue is that it contains a worldview that not all PR practitioners follow, but paints them all with the same brush. The people in charge of this forum must think that PR folks are liars, not to be trusted, as opposed to advocates of their clients, which is what they're mandated to be. Not everyone follows this. TBH, if you want to place PR folks in the same camp as this administration you'll have equal amounts that love that as hate it. The whole forum therefore has no real platform. Don't confuse spin with advocacy...
  • Reply to: The Best War Ever: Lies, Damned Lies and the Mess in Iraq   17 years 9 months ago
    "If this site chooses to watch PR groups, that's fine, but it would be appreciated if you at least tried to remain objective." It's not just a matter of watching the PR groups, but of realizing what is being done to our civil society and our democracy with the active help of many of those groups. One symptom of our society's profound dysfunction is the huge class of people who make a cushy living assuring the public that everything is hunky-dory when it really isn't. We're not talking church bake sale PR here. We're talking war and peace, slavery and freedom. Here's one person who appreciates CMD's work exactly as they're doing it.
  • Reply to: The Best War Ever: Lies, Damned Lies and the Mess in Iraq   17 years 9 months ago
    If this site chooses to watch PR groups, that's fine, but it would be appreciated if you at least tried to remain objective. Presenting a liberal viewpoint by reinforcing it with manipulating the public's perception of PR practitioners is pretty low. Don't confuse spin with advocacy...
  • Reply to: Long Island Drug Bust   17 years 9 months ago

    Doctors have the right to prescribe for off-label purposes, and

    the evidence suggests that Dr. Gleason was *accurately* describing

    the benefits of Xyprem in his speeches.

    http://sulcus.berkeley.edu/mcb/165_001/papers/manuscripts/_536.html

    I am concerned at the suppression of freedom of speech, and

    freedom of medical choice this prosecution represents.

    Xyprem is GHB, a widely used substance which is a natural metabolite

    in the body, not a toxic drug. GHB which was used for its

    pleasant relaxing qualities and several health benefits, was banned

    in the US in the 90's, for reasons that did not seem scientifically

    well-supported.

Pages