Getting Started on SourceWatch

Share/Save Share this

(revised and updated by Lisa Graves--original version prepared by Laura Miller)

Imagine that a hypothetical national non-profit organization called "Biosolids for a Solid Future" (BSF) just opened a branch in your town and is promoting the use of biosolids as fertilizer in your community. Having read Toxic Sludge is Good For You, you know "biosolids" is an industry term for sewage sludge and there are health and environmental risks associated with it. But in an op-ed piece in the town paper, a representative from BSF says biosolids are "an inexpensive and green solution for local farmers' and landscapers' fertilizing needs."

Being curious about BSF and Internet-savvy, you start to collect information on the group. After doing a few Internet searches you come across a SourceWatch entry on "biosolids." You also find an article called How to research front groups. From that, you learn how to look up BSF's IRS filings and website domain name registrations. What you discover is that BSF has links to a waste industry trade group. You write a letter-to-the-editor calling BSF a front for the waste industry, inspiring a feisty reporter at the paper to investigate. One thing leads to another, BSF's cover is blown and they quietly close up shop.

A happy ending! Or is it? BSF goes on to open an office in another town in another state. Luckily you've already thought of that and have created a SourceWatch article for Biosolids for a Solid Future. Your research is therefore available to a much wider audience, including BSF's next target.

Front groups and other PR tactics lose their effectiveness when they are exposed. As people track and share information about disinformation campaigns, it becomes easier to pull them from backroom darkness into the harsh light of public scrutiny. CMD's SourceWatch makes it easy for average citizens to be part of this truth seeking process.

If you want to use SourceWatch, first log in and check out the link to how to help write history. Creating SourceWatch articles is easy, so the best way to learn how is by simply doing it. We've posted a number of "help" and "frequently asked questions" pages, discussing the ins and outs of posting article and outlining style and formatting conventions.

To make it as simple as possible, SourceWatch runs on a "wiki" software platform that minimizes the need for any special computer skills. You will want to learn a handful of wiki markups that allow you to write and edit an entry so it looks sharp in any web browser. The markups help organize your article with headings, bold and italicized words, lists with bullet points, and hyperlinks to both SourceWatch pages and off-site resources.

New pages are created by linking from a pre-existing, topically related page. So in the above example, you would first go to the "Biosolids" page and click "edit this page." Using simple wiki mark-ups, you would create a reference with a link to "Biosolids for a Solid Future," even though that article doesn't yet exist. Clicking on the new link will then open an editor window, which allows you to enter the text for the new page. Creating new entries this way avoids creating "orphan" pages (which have no links pointing to them), helping to maintain a generally high level of connectedness within the SourceWatch.

It is also important to write articles that focus on documented facts so please include thorough citations for the supporting facts in your articles.


All you really need is the desire to collaborate on a project dedicated to supporting increased public scrutiny of public policy, exposing the manipulation of public opinion by government and industry, and hopefully, paving the way to more democracy and justice.

Comments

"Center For Science In The Public Interest" Propaganda Machine

http://www.cspinet.org/reports/chemcuisine.htm They list msg as only wrong for certain people that are very, very sensitive. Yet All americans are obese from its many hidden ingredient forms used by chemical corporations who are feeding the world with it.

The stupidity of Immigration!!!!

I really don't undersand immigration LAWS!!! They give VIsa's to all those terrorist that come in our country so easily with any hesetation. When their is a lot ot other wanting to come here and work and be with their families and THEY ALL GET DENIED because of not sufficient evidence of Hardship with in the family...What the hell do they want for one of their member of their familly to be daying. That is what I call STUPIDITY from ICE. That is why you have all those idiot people trying to kill all us because immigration has biggest idiots working for them.

CORRUPTION

I would like to know how "BP" can co-write the energy bill that John Kerry and Joe Lieberman sponsered and came out with just after the "Gulf" oil spill. Mitch mcConnell found out about this. Is it a COINCIDENCE? I want to know what in the heck is going on.

Progressives

Thank the Progressives for this: John Kerry (Democrat), Joe Leiberman (Independent, ex-Democrat).

Oregon and Coal article

You should change this comment from the article:

Oregon has virtually no coal reserves and there is no history of coal mining in the state.[23)

Not true - there were coal mines in Oregon on the south coast - last one shut sometime in the 1950's

Why Vote???

Dear Pr. Watch: I have heard many pleas, of late, from people ranging from Youtube Subscribers (mostly) to others out there who may have web sites, to just stop the nonsense and NOT VOTE!
This is due mainly to the fact that people are sick and tired of not having their voices heard, due to what they feel is the ineffective, sound-byte-using, spin machine head-quartered in Washington, DC. The young chap's youtube page, which I saw, was sort of more of a personal plea not to vote if you don't feel like it (because, obviously, this young, seemingly prosperous, and pleasing-to-the-eye young man had witnessed a lot of disappointed people, both young and old, voting, and much to their chagrin, not getting the results they wanted).
His point was, that if we really and truly want to get work done in this country that is America, maybe we should rely a little bit less on the political "spin doctor" and instead, demand real results by not going to the polls and seeing what happens. That is what "occupy wall-STREET" is all about...Changing our perspective, the way that we do things, etc., so that we may, one day, change the ultimate outcome the way in which we want. We need to pick ourselves up by our own boot-straps, work hard to get what we want, and maybe, just maybe, one day we the people will be satisfied with an outcome that we ourselves have brought about! Thanks, and have a nice day.

Are you serious?

Obama's slogan this time around is YES WE CAVE, but any of the Republican contenders would make things a lot worse.

As for state elections, can you tell me with a straight face you wouldn't vote to recall Scott Walker if you could?

In my own state, we have a good chance of throwing out at least some of the yahoos we elected to our legislature in 2010, now that people have seen what they're really about. And I definitely do not want a right-wing Republican governor to replace the centrist Democrat we've had for six years.

...demand real results by not going to the polls and seeing what happens."

What happens is that someone worse gets elected when you could have voted for someone at least a bit better. Just hold your nose and vote.

The Dilemma of Voting. ;)

Dear MutternicH: :)Hi there! Yes, thank you, I agree with you, that we need to keep on voting!!! I'm sorry about my post I put up yesterday basically encouraging voters to be apathetic, but that's probably because I was becoming apathetic due to the abysmal selection of politicians from which we have to vote for!!! :( I think that, Mutternich is right: just like, when one giant corporation dies out, an even larger (and probably more corrupt, more anti-workers' rights) corporation will take over, the same thing happens when you head to the polls and take no action. The people that you wanted to vote for, but didn't, will probably be beaten by worse people (in a worse-case scenario; sometimes, you get lucky and you realize that your head wasn't on right when you decided to vote for that person in the first place) and this will be because of the "way the cookie crumbles." In other words, things can only go downhill without a fight. Thanks for your comment! :)

Cheers!

Suphie